Legal Opinion
Kunze v. City of Columbus Police Department
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided July 11, 1991No. Nos. 91AP-160, 91AP-161PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Petree, Judge.
Appellant, John S. Kunze, appeals from a decision of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, which granted summary judgment to appellees in this consolidated workers’ compensation appeal. Appellant assigns two errors for review as follows:
“I. The trial court erred in sustaining motions for summary judgment on behalf of the City of Columbus Department of Police and Vantage Corporation.
“II. The trial court erred in overruling the motion for summary judgment on behalf of appellant John S. Kunze.”
Appellant’s assignments of error are interrelated and therefore will be considered…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fisher v. MayfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Littlefield v. Pillsbury Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
- Industrial Commission v. HenryOhio Supreme Court · 1932
- Industrial Commission v. HeilOhio Supreme Court · 1931
- Hill v. General Metal Heat Treating, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Montgomery County v. WadeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Schultz v. Pojoaque Tribal Police Dep'tNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
- Schultz Ex Rel. Schultz v. Pojoaque Tribal Police DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
- Canario v. Culhane, 91-5526 (1998)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 1998