Legal Opinion · Dissent

Matter of Estate of Harrington

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1982No. 5606Published

1DissentBrown, Justice

It is difficult for me to understand the basis for affirming the trial court. Affirming the trial court leaves its judgment intact, yet the majority says that the court did not have jurisdiction to do what it did.

The majority suggests that the surviving spouse may pursue a quiet title action in the district court or ask that court to impose a “constructive” trust (technically, a resulting trust) for her benefit. I suppose it logically follows, according to the majority, that any title to property derived through a decree of distribution is untrustworthy and that proceedings in the district…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Stickney v. StickneySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Cacy v. CacySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. Peterson v. MasseyNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  4. TERRY AND COMPANY v. HensenWyoming Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Nussbacher v. ManderfeldWyoming Supreme Court · 1947

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API