Rodgers v. Howard, Judge
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Per curiam
This is an original proceeding in this Court, and embraces three separate motions filed by the same party, each seeking a writ of procedendo ad' judicium.
The petitioner here is the plaintiff in an action pending in the Circuit Court of Howard county against the Campbell Soup Company. The respondent is the Judge of the Ninth Judicial Circuit, which includes Howard county; and the prayer of each motion is that this Court require the respondent to adjudicate petitioner’s case in the Circuit Court. We forego any discussion of (1) the history and original functions of the writ of procedendo ad…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Kentucky Whip & Collar Co. v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Standard Dredging Corp. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Gillioz v. Kincannon, JudgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
- Citizens' Union National Bank v. ThweattSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Pellegrini v. WolfeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
- Ark-La Feed & Fertilizer Company v. Marco Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
- Fritchey v. SummarDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1949
- Leggett v. KirbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
- Bowsher v. DigbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.