Legal Opinion

Lamb v. General Film Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 4, 1912No. 19,000PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; George H. Théard, Judge. Action by H. W. Lamb against the General Eilm Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSommerville, J.

A question of practice is the principal one disclosed in this record. Plaintiff sued defendant on a contract of sale. May 12, 1911, plaintiff took a default. Immediately thereafter, on the same day, defendant filed both a dilatory and peremptory exception. Both parties to the record treated the exception as an exception. May 26, 1911, the peremptory exception was regularly taken up for trial, and it was overruled. Immediately upon the ruling of the court, counsel for plaintiff moved the court to receive evidence and decide the issues in the cause in confirmation of the judgment by default…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bijou Co. v. LehmannSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
  2. Lang v. KimballSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1840
  3. Lea v. TerrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1860
  4. State ex rel. Borland v. Judge of the Second Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1878
  5. Hiestand v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1859

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Soaper v. KingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. Amer. Bank & Tr. Co. v. Marbane Investments, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Alley v. PeesoMontana Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API