Legal Opinion

Seessel Holdings, Inc. v. Fleming Companies, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided November 20, 1996No. 96-2620-GVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ AND DEFENDANT BRUNO’S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

GIBBONS, Chief Judge.

Before the court are plaintiffs’ and defendants’ motions for summary judgment in this declaratory judgment action. The parties have stated their mutual belief that summary judgment is the appropriate method for resolution of this matter and that the only facts and documents material to the determination of the parties’ motions are those set forth in ' the Stipulation, Appendix, and Exhibits submitted to the court. For the following reasons, plaintiffs’ and defendant Bruno’s motions for summary…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Bob Pearsall Motors, Inc. v. Regal Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Farmers-Peoples Bank v. ClemmerTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Cocke County Board of Highway Commissioners v. Newport Utilities BoardTennessee Supreme Court · 1985
  4. John R. Miller v. Lesea Broadcasting, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  5. West Texas Transmission, L.P. v. Enron CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re New Era Resorts, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1999
  2. Ski, Ltd. v. Mountainside Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  3. Notredan, LLC v. Old Republic Exchange Facilitator Co.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2012
  4. ST. GEORGE'S DRAGONS v. Newport Real Estate Group, LLCNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API