Legal Opinion

Payton v. Nordstrom, Inc.

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided September 12, 2006No. 1:06CV388PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

WALLACE W. DIXON, U.S. Magistrate Judge.

Before this court is Defendant Nord-strom’s motion to compel arbitration and for a stay pending arbitration or, alternatively, for dismissal of this action (docket no. 8). Pro se Plaintiff Gregory Payton has not responded to the motion and the time to do so passed. The parties have not consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge; therefore, the motion must be addressed by way of recommendation. For the following reasons, it will be recommended that the court grant Defendant’s motion to dismiss.

I.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Choice Hotels International, Incorporated v. Bsr Tropicana Resort, Incorporated, a Florida Corporation Susan Hounsom Milton JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
  5. Johnston County v. R. N. Rouse & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Titanium Dioxide Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
  2. A & G COAL CORP. v. Integrity Coal Sales, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2009
  3. Smith v. Walmart Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API