Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Mayo v. United States

District Court, E.D. Illinois

Decided May 10, 1976No. Civ. 74-251-EPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

FOREMAN, District Judge:

Plaintiff seeks return of a printing press and other personal property illegally seized by agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation on or about August 12, 1972, in Jonesboro, Illinois. In the alternative, plaintiff seeks monetary damages to the extent of the value of the property. At plaintiff’s trial on various criminal charges in the Federal District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, the said property was held to be inadmissible as evidence, being the product of an illegal search and seizure. Plaintiff was convicted of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. One 1958 Plymouth Sedan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. United States v. StowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. United States v. One (1) 1971 Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Serial 4a25791h1, Its Tools and Appurtenances, Michael Ohlmann, Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  4. State of New Jersey v. MoriarityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1967
  5. King v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. William C. FarrellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
  2. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  3. Director of Fin., Pr. Geo's Co. v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  4. United States v. Eight (8) Rhodesian Stone StatuesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1978
  5. Mayo v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API