Dodge v. Ridenour
California Supreme Court
Appeal by Samuel Crozier, one of the defendants, from the judgments of the Superior Court of- the City and County of San Francisco, the one rendered May 27, 1880, for six thousand five hundred and fifty dollars and seventy-five cents, and the other May 29,1880, for seven thousand one hundred and seventy-seven dollars and seventy-five cents, and from the order refusing to vacate and set aside said judgments, and to grant a new trial. Sullivan, J. Action on contract.
Read the full summary
Appeal by Samuel Crozier, one of the defendants, from the judgments of the Superior Court of- the City and County of San Francisco, the one rendered May 27, 1880, for six thousand five hundred and fifty dollars and seventy-five cents, and the other May 29,1880, for seven thousand one hundred and seventy-seven dollars and seventy-five cents, and from the order refusing to vacate and set aside said judgments, and to grant a new trial. Sullivan, J. Action on contract. The plaintiffs, W. W. Dodge & Co., on April 26, 1879, commenced the action in the 12th District Court against the defendants, W.…
1Opinion of the Court
The Court:
We think the Court below should have granted the motion to set aside the judgment. The case is within Section 473, C. C. P. The judgment and order are reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings with instructions, that a new trial be granted.
2Cited by4 opinions
- Hanthorn v. OliverOregon Supreme Court · 1897
- Grady v. DonahooCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Scottish Union Insurance v. Tomkies & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1902
- O'Connor v. EllmakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890