State Highway Commissioner v. Breisacher
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.
The legislature at the 1923 session made provision for the widening and improvement of Woodward avenue between Detroit and Pontiac (Act No. 259, Pub. Acts 1923). In carrying out the project, lands owned by defendant in Oakland county were needed and the State highway commissioner instituted these condemnation proceedings under the general highway law in the probate court of Oakland county; commissioners were appointed, much testimony was taken, the question of necessity was found in favor of the State and damages awarded. Defendant here reviews the proceedings on certiorari.
On the day set for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Loomis v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- City of Detroit v. Fidelity Realty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Detroit, Bay City & Western Railroad v. First National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Story & Clark Piano Co. v. Ottawa Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Plantenga v. Grand Rapids Terminal Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dohany v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Fitzsimons & Galvin, Inc. v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- State Highway Commissioner v. McCarthyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- State Highway Commissioner v. SaboMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
- Rogers v. WeakleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1929