Legal Opinion

Bluffton Artificial Ice Co. v. Richardson

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 17, 1900No. 3,088PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Erom the Adams Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

—Suit by appellee for damages for alleged breach of a contract. Special finding of facts, with conclusion of law and judgment in appellee’s favor for $195.6?. Appellant excepted to the conclusion of law and moved for a new trial.

The special findings are sustained by the evidence, and in this particular we can not disturb the trial court’s conclusion. The conclusion of law was correctly stated in appellee’s favor if the amount named therein is right.

By the contract sued on the appellant agreed to furnish and appellee to take a certain quantity of ice at an agreed price during a certain period.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. BarberIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railroad v. RenickerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. White v. McGrewIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Greenfield v. JohnsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API