Legal Opinion
Breazil v. Bartlett
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided September 29, 1997No. 6:95-cv-01016PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
TELESCA, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Aaron Breazil, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that his civil rights were violated by defendants, George Bartlett, Michael Rabideau, and John Burge., By motion dated November 15, 1996, defendants moved for summary judgment against the plaintiff. By. motion dated November 27, 1996, plaintiff cross-moved to amend the complaint and for appointment of counsel. On April 22, 1997, this case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Carol E. Heckman, for all proceedings necessary to determine the…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Arnett v. SnyderAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Barnes v. HendersonDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009
- Borden v. HofmannSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- Arnett v. SnyderAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Arnett v. SnyderAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.