Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Henderson

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided June 23, 2009No. 06-CV-6363LPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge.

Plaintiff Arrello Barnes, appearing pro se, commenced this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff, an inmate in the New York State Department of Correctional Services (“DOCS”), alleges that defendants Robert Henderson and John Burge, who at all relevant times were officials or employees of DOCS, violated his constitutional right to procedural due process in connection with a disciplinary hearing held at Elmira Correctional Facility (“Elmira”) in April 2006.

Defendants have moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(e) of the Federal…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Rubin Sira v. R. Morton, C. Artuz, D. Selsky, and G. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  5. Ponte v. RealSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Vogelfang v. CapraDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  2. Burroughs v. MitchellDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2018
  3. Moore v. PetersDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2015
  4. Brooks v. PrackDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2014
  5. Barnes v. FedeleDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API