Legal Opinion
Morningstar v. General Motors Corp.
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided February 9, 1994No. Civ. A. No. 3:93-cv-186WSPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WINGATE, District Judge.
Before the court is the motion of the defendant, General Motors Corporation (hereinafter “GM”), for summary judgment or, in the alternative, for change of venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (1988). The court will treat this motion as one for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(c),1 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Having considered the motion, the response, and the arguments in memoranda of the parties, the court is persuaded that the defendant’s motion for summary judgment is well taken and should be granted.
PARTIES AND JURISDICTION
Plai…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Christmas v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
- In re Fresenius Granuflo/Naturalyte Dialysate Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- Buford Keith Christmas v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
- Morningstar v. Gen'l Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994