Booth v. A. Levy & J. Zentner Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order refusing a new trial. George H. Cabaniss, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
Plaintiff obtained a judgment against defendant in the sum of $671, as damages for its refusal to accept and pay for a carload of cranberries, consisting of 215 barrels, alleged to have been sold and delivered by plaintiff’s assignor to defendant at an agreed price of $5.50 per barrel-f. o. b. at shipping point.
Defendant among other things pleaded and relied at the trial upon the statute of frauds as a defense to the action, and the vital question presented by this appeal arises out of this defense. The question is not only raised by the answer, but is presented by timely objections to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Breckinridge v. CrockerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Ringer v. HoltzclawSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
- Blood v. La Serena Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Hicks v. PostCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. WilkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Blumauer-Frank Drug Co. v. YoungIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
- Goldstein v. McNeilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Irving Tier Co. v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Dickerman v. Ohashi Importing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.