Legal Opinion

GAINSCO AUTO INSURANCE v. CORNIELES

District Court, D. Utah

Decided June 26, 2026No. 2:26-cv-00006Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION GAINSCO AUTO INSURANCE, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING [8] REVISED EX PARTE MOTION FOR ALTERNATIVE v. SERVICE CORNIELES, Case No. 2:26-cv-00006-CMR Defendant. Chief Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero Before the court is Plaintiff Gainsco Auto Insurance’s (Plaintiff) Revised Ex Parte Motion for Alternative Service (Revised Motion) (ECF 8). Plaintiff seeks to serve Defendant Miguel A. Lopez Cornieles (Defendant) by alternative means pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(e) (id. at 2). Having…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Jackson Const. Co., Inc. v. MarrsUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Parker v. ROSSUtah Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Garcia v. GarciaUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Wittingham v. TNE Limited PartnershipUtah Supreme Court · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API