Legal Opinion
Medei v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 18, 1985No. Civ. A. 82-5273, 82-5160, 83-513PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
TROUTMAN, Senior District Judge.
Before this Court are three cases involving Bethlehem Steel’s 1980 Salaried Pension Plan. All three cases involve the denial of a lump-sum form of payment of retirement benefits. Plaintiffs Raymond and Alice Foulke, Nazareno and Irene Medei, and Andrew and Marian Kavcak, allege violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. (ER-ISA). Specifically, they contend that the General Pension Board’s denial of their requests for a lump-sum payment of retirement benefits violated §§ 1132 and 1133 of ERISA. 1
Defend…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Rosen v. Hotel And Restaurant Employees & Bartenders Union Of Phila.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Wolf, Dorothy, G. v. National Shopmen Pension Fund Shopmen's Local 548 Gehringer, Richard H. Appeal of National Shopmen Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Columbo A. Bencivenga and Adeline Bencivenga v. The Western Pennsylvania Teamsters and Employers Pension Fund, and the Trustees ThereofCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Gaines, Edith v. The Amalgamated Insurance FundCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Merrill Farms Corp. v. H.R. Hindle & Co., Inc. (In Re H.R. Hindle & Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993