Matter of Estate of Swinson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRASWELL, Judge.
The main issue is whether Eudora Holmes Swinson was the lawful wife of Richard Swinson, Jr., so as to be qualified to dissent from his will at his death. For the reasons stated below we hold that she was lawfully married to Richard Swinson, Jr., that as his widow she could and did dissent, and that the dissent is valid as a matter of law on the facts of this case.
On 3 July 1981 Richard Swinson, Jr., died testate. On 29 July 1981 his will was admitted to probate. The will made no provision for Eudora Holmes Swinson. She filed a dissent on 2 September 1981.
Richard Swinson, Jr.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chalmers v. WomackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Matter of Estate of AdameeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Kearney v. . ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- In Re Estate of LowtherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Parker v. American Lumber Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Matter of Estate of PateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- Matter of Estate of LongestCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Matter of Estate of OutenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Matthews v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- In Re the Estate of MangumCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.