Legal Opinion
United States v. DiVarco
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 6, 1985No. 84 CR 507PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
On January 9, 1985 each of Joseph DiVarco (“DiVarco”) and Ronald Ignoffo (“Ignoffo”) was convicted by a jury on all counts in which he was named in the indictment in this case. On January 10 the government moved for the detention of each of them pursuant to the Bail Reform Act of 1984 (the “Act”), 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a) (“Section 3143(a)”), 1 claiming each of them (though not any of their four convicted codefendants) was likely to pose a danger to the safety of other persons or the community if released pursuant to Sections 3142(b) or (c).
This…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Stack v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Carlson v. LandonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Howard Perry, Glen Hagen, James Geran, Kevin Dorr. United States of America v. Howard Perry and Gary MooreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Emerson MoltCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Faheem-El v. KlincarDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
- Garcia v. ElrodDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
- United States v. RossDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.