Legal Opinion
Coady v. Cross Country Bank, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided January 25, 2007No. 2005AP2770PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUNDSTEN, PJ.
¶ 1. Cross Country Bank and Applied Card Systems (collectively, "Cross Country") appeal the circuit court's order denying their motion to compel arbitration and stay court proceedings. The plaintiffs, individuals who hold credit cards through Cross Country, sued Cross Country and sought to proceed as a class, alleging that Cross Country engaged in illegal debt collection practices in violation of the Wisconsin Consumer Act. Cross Country argues that the circuit court erred in concluding that the arbitration clause in its credit card agreement with the plaintiffs is…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State v. PettitCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
- Discover Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Brown Ex Rel. Brown v. Genesis HealthcareWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2011
- McKee v. AT & T CORP.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
- McKee v. AT&T Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
- Renee Everett v. Paul Davis Restoration, IncorpCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- SDS Autos, Inc. v. ChrzanowskiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.