Legal Opinion

Bank One Utah, N.A. v. West Jordan City

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided August 15, 2002No. 20000785-CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ORME, Judge:

{1 Bank One appeals the summary judgment in favor of West Jordan City, which judgment was premised on the conclusion that the bank's statutorily required notice of claim was not timely filed. Bank One contends it did not have a reason to initiate a claim against West Jordan until it knew of West Jordan's responsibility for the bank's injury and the amount of its damages. We reverse.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

"In reviewing a grant of summary judgment, we review the facts and all reasonable inferences drawn therefrom in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party." Regal Ins. Co.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Warren v. Provo City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Becton Dickinson and Co. v. ReeseUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Vincent v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Stahl v. Utah Transit AuthorityUtah Supreme Court · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jones v. Salt Lake City Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2003
  2. Cedar Professional Plaza, L.C. v. Cedar City Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2006
  3. Jones v. Salt Lake City Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API