State v. Steen
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtHoughton, J.
¶1 Joseph Steen appeals his conviction and sentence for indecent exposure with sexual motivation, claiming trial court instructional and sentencing error. We affirm the conviction but vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing.
FACTS
¶2 On June 28, 2008, Katrina Berge and Teresa Jones, a receptionist and a guest at an Aberdeen hotel, observed Steen across the river in a local park with his pants pulled down to mid-thigh, fully exposing himself. He appeared to be masturbating and rubbing himself all over his body. Berge reported the incident to the police and Aberdeen Police Department…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. JacobsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- In re the Personal Restraint of GoodwinWashington Supreme Court · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. SteenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- State Of Washington v. Michael Degalvez WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- State Of Washington, V. Pedro Barrera-floresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- State v. SteenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010