Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
JACOBSON, Judge.
The primary question raised by this appeal by writ of certiorari deals with the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the Industrial Commission’s award.
On January 9, 1968 the claimant, Salo-mon Madril sustained a back injury while lifting a pipe during the course of his employment with Fisher Enterprises, Inc. who was insured for workmen’s compensation by the State Compensation Fund (Fund). On' May IS, 1969 the Industrial Commission in awarding Madril temporary disability found that he had no physical or mental disability resulting from the industrial accident. - ■ Thereafter…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Murray v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Russell v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- Fish v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
- Young v. Hodgman & Mac VicarArizona Supreme Court · 1933
- Mueller v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Estes Corporation v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Artis v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- City Van & Storage v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975