Logan & Maphet Lumber Co. v. Cross
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM SCOTT. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Scott County.— EL G. Kyle, Chancellor.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil
The first and fundamental question to be determined is whether the matters contained in the present bill must be' considered as settled between the parties, in so far as they are the same as those contained in the bill immediately preceding it, filed by the present complainants against the present defendants, and- determined by this court in 1910, on bill and demurrer.
*697To the extent that the two bills are the same, we are of the opinion that the matters involved must be considered settled, as hereinafter more particularly stated.
This conclusion .is resisted by defendants on the ground that the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Jourolmon v. MassengillTennessee Supreme Court · 1887
- Battle v. StreetTennessee Supreme Court · 1886
- Clark v. PenceTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sykes v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1931
- Owens v. Owens Et Ux.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1937