Legal Opinion

Clark v. Pence

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1903PublishedCited by 6 opinions

PROM WASHINGTON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Washington County. — Hal. H. Haynes, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McAlister

Complainants, as sureties on the bond of D. S. North-ington, who, qualified as administrator of Julia Pence, deceased, filed this bill quia timet, to be exonerated from liability for funds collected by said administrator belonging to the estate of Pleasant Witt, deceased. It was conceded that said sureties were liable for all assets that came into said administrator’s hands belonging to the estate of Julia Pence, deceased, but it was alleged that he had also collected funds due the estate of said Witt. The controversy arises upon the following facts found by the court of chancery appeals…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jourolmon v. MassengillTennessee Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Battle v. StreetTennessee Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Wood v. TomlinTennessee Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Jameson v. McCoyTennessee Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tucker v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Nye v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Commercial Nursery Co. v. IveyTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Logan & Maphet Lumber Co. v. CrossTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Federal Kemper Life Assurance Co. v. Old Republic Surety Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API