Legal Opinion

State v. Darabcsek

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 13, 1967No. 52349PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGER, Presiding Judge.

Defendant was found guilty by a jury of the unlawful possession of a stimulant drug, and a fine of $300 was imposed. The offense is a violation of § 195.240, Laws 1963, Cum.Supp.1965, V.A.M.S. The crime is one of the character sometimes referred to as a “mixed felony,” with possible imprisonment up to ten years (Laws 1963, p. 363, § 1). Consequently, we have jurisdiction.

The principal errors alleged are the overruling of defendant’s motion to suppress “all evidence pertaining to five (5) white pills” found by police in a search of his person, and the admission of such…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Go-Bart Importing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. State v. BrookshireSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. GlaubmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
  2. State v. AchterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Buford Linwood St. Clair v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  4. Stewart v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  5. State v. HuttonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API