State v. Darabcsek
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
EAGER, Presiding Judge.
Defendant was found guilty by a jury of the unlawful possession of a stimulant drug, and a fine of $300 was imposed. The offense is a violation of § 195.240, Laws 1963, Cum.Supp.1965, V.A.M.S. The crime is one of the character sometimes referred to as a “mixed felony,” with possible imprisonment up to ten years (Laws 1963, p. 363, § 1). Consequently, we have jurisdiction.
The principal errors alleged are the overruling of defendant’s motion to suppress “all evidence pertaining to five (5) white pills” found by police in a search of his person, and the admission of such…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Go-Bart Importing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- State v. BrookshireSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- People v. GlaubmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
- State v. AchterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
- Buford Linwood St. Clair v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Stewart v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
- State v. HuttonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.