Legal Opinion
Maphis Chapman Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided November 2, 1966No. 9920_1PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOREMAN, Circuit Judge.
Maphis Chapman Corporation (hereinafter “company”) petitions this court to review and set aside those portions of a decision and order of the National Labor Relations Board which adjudge it guilty of unfair labor practices subsequent to October 23, 1963. The Board counters by asking that its order be enforced.
The company does not contest the Board’s findings that prior to October 23, 1963, it violated sections 8(a) (1) and (3) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 158(a) (1) and (3) (1964), by discriminatorily discharging, coercively interrogating and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- National Labor Relations Board v. Reed & Prince Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1953
- National Labor Relations Board v. Dan River Mills, Incorporated, Alabama DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Appletree Chevrolet, Inc., Sheet Metal Workers' International Association, Local 66, Afl-Cio, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
- Automated Business Systems, a Division of Litton Business Systems, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- National Labor Relations Board v. Dayton Motels, Inc., D/B/A Holiday Inn of DaytonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
- The Firestone Tire and Rubber Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
- National Labor Relations Board v. Consolidated Diesel Electric Company, Division of Condec CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.