Legal Opinion

Paul E. O'ROuRke v. United States of America, Warren T. Dewan v. United States of America, Anthony Di Gangi v. United States

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided October 25, 1957No. 5274-5276PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAGRUDER, Chief Judge.

Appellants and others were tried together upon a number of indictments charging conspiracy to use the mails to defraud, contrary to 18 U.S.C. § 371, and charging various substantive offenses of using the mails to defraud, contrary to 18 U.S.C. § 1341. After a lengthy trial the jury, having been directed to render verdicts of acquittal in favor of defendant DiGangi on the indictments charging substantive offenses, brought in a verdict of guilty against DiGangi on the conspiracy indictment. The jury also brought in verdicts of guilty against defendants Dewan and O’Rourke…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Ekberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948
  3. Wells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Bradford v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gilbert Holt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
  2. Robert v. Dotson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API