Legal Opinion

Gilbert Holt v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 15, 1960No. 735PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner was convicted by a jury in the District Court for the unlawful possession of heroin and was sentenced to a term of ten years imprisonment as an habitual offender. 26 U.S.C. § 7237.

In the District Court he filed a motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis which was denied by the District Judge on the ground that his claim of error was frivolous. In this Court he has renewed his motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis.

The District Judge gave careful consideration to this motion. He pointed out in his order that the only error complained of by petitioner was “that the court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Feldman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. United States v. Marvin MosesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
  4. Charlie West v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  5. Paul E. O'ROuRke v. United States of America, Warren T. Dewan v. United States of America, Anthony Di Gangi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1957

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shields v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1962
  2. United States v. FranklinDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1970
  3. Ryan v. KroppDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API