Legal Opinion
Pierro v. Baxendale
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided November 21, 1955PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
20 N.J. 17 (1955)
118 A.2d 401
ALPHONSE PIERRO AND FRANK PIERRO, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
WILLIAM H. BAXENDALE, BUILDING INSPECTOR OF THE BOROUGH OF PALISADES PARK, AND MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF PALISADES PARK, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued October 3, 1955.
Decided November 21, 1955.
Mr. Max Eisenstein argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Eisenstein & Eisenstein, attorneys).
Mr. James A. Major argued the cause for the respondents.
The opinion of the court was delivered by JACOBS, J.
In 1939 Palisades Park adopted a zoning ordinance which divided the…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Day-Brite Lighting, Inc. v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Schmidt v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, CITY OF NEWARKSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Summer Cottagers' Ass'n of Cape May v. City of Cape MaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Township of Ewing v. KingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976