Legal Opinion

Perry v. Brown

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 8, 1993PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YANOFF, J.S.C.

(temporarily assigned, retired, on recall).

This opinion is a supplement to that portion of Fuechtbaum v. Constantini, 59 N.J. 167, 280 A.2d 161 (1971), which authorized service upon the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund (N.J.S.A. 39:6-61 to -91). The Fuechtbaum case dealt with two classes of *574defendant: 1) a defendant having insurance coverage; and 2) a defendant without insurance coverage.

As to both, the Court ruled that service could be made in the case of the insured defendant, upon the insurance company, and in the case of the uninsured defendant, upon the Unsatisfied Claim…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  5. Wuchter v. PizzuttiSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Samuel v. DoeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  2. STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. DENISE WILLIAMS (19-0002, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API