Legal Opinion

Mataipule v. Tifaimoana Partnership, Ltd.

High Court of American Samoa

Decided March 21, 1990No. CA No. 34-89Published

1Opinion of the Court

On Motion to Dismiss:

Introduction

Plaintiff Luafatu Mataipule was injured on April 1, 1987. He seeks damages against a number of defendants including the American Samoa Government (hereinafter "A.S.G"). For tort actions against A.S.G., the Government Tort Liability Act provides for a two year statute of limitations. See A.S.C.A. § 43.1204. Almost two years after he was injured, plaintiff filed an administrative claim with the Attorney General on March 14, 1989, and then filed this action on March 31, 1989, obviously with the intention of initiating his claim before the applicable limitations…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. McMahon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Crown Coat Front Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. City of Taylor v. HodgesTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Wade v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API