Legal Opinion
Horton Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Tol-O-Matic Inc. William Toles
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided August 24, 1992No. 91-3014, 91-3501PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROY, Senior District Judge.
William Toles and Tol-O-Matic, Inc. (hereinafter collectively “Tol-O-Matic”) appeal from the judgment of the district court 1 enjoining Tol-O-Matic from manufacturing industrial clutches substantially similar to those made by Horton Manufacturing Co., Inc. and awarding Horton damages and attorneys’ fees. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
I
Horton and Tol-O-Matic are competitors in the manufacture and sale of industrial clutches. In early 1985, Horton became aware that Tol-O-Matic was manufacturing and selling certain clutches (the “ADAM Products”) which bore…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Paramount Pictures Corporation v. Metro Program Network, Inc. Gerald Fitzgerald Kocr-TvCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Case International Company v. T.L. James and Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Froysland v. Leef Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Donald Frederick Evans & Associates, Inc. v. Continental Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Amf Incorporated v. International Fiberglass Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Taylor Corporation v. Four Seasons Greetings, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Winthrop Resources Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation v. The Stanley Works, a Connecticut CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Matter of Trust Created by HillCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Barry v. BarryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Rahr Malting Company v. Climatic Control Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.