Legal Opinion

Rahr Malting Company v. Climatic Control Company, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 24, 1998No. 97-2712PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KOPF, District Judge.

Rahr Malting Company (Rahr) appeals from the decision on cross motions for declaratory judgment entered in favor of Climatic Control Company, Inc. (Climatic). Rahr asserts that the district court erred in construing a waiver clause contained in a standard American Institute of Architects’ contractor agreement. After careful consideration, we conclude the district court’s decision was correct 2 and we affirm.

I

Factual Background

Rahr owns and operates a production plant in Shakopee, Minnesota, which processes barley into malt for the beer industry. This processing occurs in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. A.C.C.T., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  2. Horton Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Tol-O-Matic Inc. William TolesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  3. James L. Haugen v. Total Petroleum, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. A.C.C.T., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  2. Asic II Ltd. v. Stonhard, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 1999
  3. Copper Mountain, Inc. v. Industrial Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2009
  4. Copper Mountain, Inc. v. Industrial Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API