Legal Opinion

Burriss v. Northern Assurance Co. of America

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 30, 1984No. 56,331PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Miller, J.:

This is an appeal by the defendant, Northern Assurance Company of America, from a judgment of the District Court of Johnson County, finding two provisions of the Kansas Automobile Injury Reparations Act, K.S.A. 40-3103(1) and (y), unconstitutional and entering judgment for the plaintiff, Josephine Burriss. The determinative question on appeal is the constitutionality of the statute.

The facts are not in dispute. Lloyd Burriss and his wife, Josephine Burriss, residents of Johnson County, were the named insureds in an automobile insurance…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Husky Hogs, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  2. Coma Corp. v. Kansas Department of LaborSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  3. Miner v. Farm Bur. Mut. Ins. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1992
  4. Clements v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  5. Fitzgerald v. City of Ottawa, Kan.District Court, D. Kansas · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API