Legal Opinion

Westinghausen v. People

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1880PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Error to Saginaw. Complaint under Act 268 of 1879 for selling liquor without paying the liquor tax. Respondent was convicted.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Plaintiff was convicted under the Liquor Law of 1879 of selling liquor without having paid the required tax.

The case comes up on two specified objections to the constitutionality of the law — First, that the amendment whereby the anti-license clause in the original constitution was repealed, was not lawfully submitted to the people; and second, that the law does not indicate the object to which the tax is to be applied.

This last point refers to article 14, § 14, of the Constitution, which declares that “ Every law which imposes, continues, or revives a tax, shall distinctly state the tax, and…

2Cited by27 opinions

  1. Ellingham v. DyeIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Detroit City Railway v. MillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. McConaughy v. Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  4. State Tax Commission v. ShattuckArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Rice v. PalmerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API