Legal Opinion

Estate of Bishop

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 26, 1900No. Appeal, No. 221PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal, No. 221, Jan. T., 1899, by the Charter National Bank of Media, from decree of O. C. Delaware Co., dismissing exceptions to auditor’s report. Exceptions to auditor’s report. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. Errors assigned were in dismissing exceptions to auditor’s report.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chiee Justice Green,

The facts found by the auditor are absolutely fatal to the claim of the appellant. There is no conflicting testimony as to what the facts were. The appellant bank held a note drawn by Nelson H. Strong to the order of Matilda Y. Bishop for $2,200, *87at four months, dated November 19,1894, falling due, and protested for nonpayment on March 22, 1895. This note was indorsed by the payee for the accommodation of the drawer, and was discounted by the appellant bank. Before the maturity of the note Mrs. Bishop died, and at the time of its maturity the bank took from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Siebeneck v. Anchor Savings BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  2. Farmers' National Bank v. MarshallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Yubas v. MakranskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Bank of York v. WebsterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  3. In Re Estate of Agnes Marie UhligSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API