Legal Opinion

Competitive Edge v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided November 9, 1988No. Court No. 86-07-00981Published

1Opinion of the Court

DiCarlo, Judge:

This action concerns the proper tariff classification of athletic shoes from Taiwan invoiced as "Men’s PVC Suede Sponge Leather Sport Shoes.” The United States Customs Service (Customs) classified the shoes under item 700.61 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS), as "[o]ther: [fjootwear having soles * * * of rubber or plasics * * * affixed to the upper exclusively with an adhesive * * * [v]alued not over $6.50 per pair.”

The Competitive Edge (importer) contends the shoes are properly classifiable under item 700.56, TSUS, as "[o]ther footwear * * * [h]aving uppers…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. R. H. MacY & Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  3. F. B. Vandegrift & Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  4. R. H. Macy & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  5. F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API