Dove v. Neal
District Court, N.D. Indiana
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION DeANGELO DOVE, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 3:21-CV-449-DRL-MGG RON NEAL et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER DeAngelo Dove, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a second amended complaint (ECF 36) after this court twice determined his previous complaints did not state any claims. See ECF 10 & ECF 21. “A document filed pro se is to be liberally construed, and a pro se complaint, however inartfully pleaded, must be held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.” Erickson v. Pardus,
551 U.S. 89, 94
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.