Legal Opinion

Dove v. Neal

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided November 16, 2023No. 3:21-cv-00449Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION DeANGELO DOVE, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 3:21-CV-449-DRL-MGG RON NEAL et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER DeAngelo Dove, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a second amended complaint (ECF 36) after this court twice determined his previous complaints did not state any claims. See ECF 10 & ECF 21. “A document filed pro se is to be liberally construed, and a pro se complaint, however inartfully pleaded, must be held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.” Erickson v. Pardus,

551 U.S. 89, 94

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API