Legal Opinion

Billings Credit Men's Ass'n v. Bogert

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 11, 1925No. 4399PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunt, Circuit Judge

(after stating'the facts as above). The petitioner takes the position that the order to show cause made after the decision of this court and the subsequent order based thereon, removing petitioner as trustee, are void as in excess of the jurisdiction of the District Court, while respondent contends that the District Court had the power to remove the petitioner as trustee for cause, without complaint of the creditors.

Under the Bankruptcy Act of 1867, § 18 (section 5039, Rev. St.) the court, after due notice and hearing, was expressly given power to “remove an assignee for any cause” which in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bardes v. Hawarden BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Westall v. AveryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1909
  3. Nelson v. Svea Pub. Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1910

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Evarts v. Eloy Gin Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  2. Smith v. Chase Nat. Bank of City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
  3. Kaplan v. GuttmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  4. Kaplan v. GuttmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  5. In re Seeley Tube & Box Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API