Brown v. Allstate Insurance

WHICHARD, Judge.

Plaintiffs sole contention is that the court erred in refusing to admit a bill itemizing the cost of repairing her automobile. She argues that the bill was “an important link in the chain of evidence tending to prove the considerable degree of severity in the force of impact.” More specifically, she argues that evidence of the force of the impact was relevant and material to the issue of whether the chiropractic services were necessary. We find no prejudicial error.

To be admissible, evidence must be relevant, i.e., it must have a “tendency to make the existence of any fact…