Legal Opinion

Stone v. National City Bank

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 5, 1915PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court No. 2 of Baltimore City. (Ambler, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.

On the 22nd day of September,'1911, Mrs. Sarah Hunter, a resident of Fredericksburg, Virginia, deposited with the National City Bank of Baltimore the sum of six thousand dollars. The deposit was in the form following:

The National City Bank of Baltimore.

Dr. In Account With

Sarah Hunter, or Sara B. Heineman.

1911—Sept. 22—Cash $6,000 In Trust for both, joint owners, subject to the order of Sarah Hunter, the balance at death of either to go to the survivor.

The sum thus deposited was the individual money of Sarah Hunter. No part of the principal of the sum deposited was withdrawn, but interest on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Milholland v. WhalenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
  2. Taylor v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
  3. Minor v. RogersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1873
  4. Smith v. DarbyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
  5. Cox v. HillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1854

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Sturgis v. Citizens National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  2. Mushaw v. MushawCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  3. Pope v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1932
  4. Shaffer v. LohrCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  5. Bradford v. Eutaw Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API