Legal Opinion

Keehn v. McGillicuddy

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 18, 1896No. 2,126PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From the Porter Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtLotz, J.

The appellant was the plaintiff below, and her complaint consisted of four paragraphs. The second paragraph was withdrawn, and demurrers were sustained to each of the others. The rulings on these demurrers are the errors assigned.

The first paragraph alleges, in substance, that the plaintiff is the owner of a certain tract of land situate within the corporate limits of the city of Valparaiso, fronting and abutting on Locust street; that in the year of 1886, the common council of said city passed an ordinance fixing and establishing the grade for such street; and that the street was graded and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Wabash v. AlberIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. City of Jeffersonville v. MyersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. JohnsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API