Legal Opinion

Strauss v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided December 8, 2003No. 07-02-0453-CRPublishedCited by 134 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BRIAN QUINN, Justice.

Jai B. Strauss appeals his conviction for possessing marijuana. Through four issues he contends that the trial court erred in denying his motions to suppress evidence and to dismiss the cause. He believed the evidence was subject to suppression and the cause subject to dismissal because his detention and the ensuing search of his van were illegal. We affirm the judgment.

Background

In pertinent part, the record illustrates that appellant and a passenger were stopped on 1-40 outside McLean, Texas, for speeding. The two were in a Chevrolet van with Ohio plates, which…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Carmouche v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  4. Prystash v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  5. McCullough v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by134 opinions

  1. Matthews, Cornelious L.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
  2. Cole v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
  3. Sieffert v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2009
  4. Parker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2009
  5. Stone v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004

129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API