State Ex Rel. Tegt v. Circuit Court
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Three questions are raised on this appeal:
1. Is the petition of the objectors void for uncertainty?
We conclude that no one was misled by it in the slightest degree, nor is it claimed that anyone was, and under all the circumstances of this case, the protest in form and matter, satisfied the statute.
2. Must the freeholders referred to in sec. 61.07 (1), Stats., be residents of the area proposed to be incorporated ?
The statute in question reads :
“61.07 ... (1) If prior to the date set for a hearing upon such application there is filed with the court a petition protest ing against the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- La Londe v. Board of SupervisorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
- Town of Blooming Grove v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
- Buschman v. ZerfasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
3Cited by5 opinions
- Certain Electors v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Katona v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1956
- Katona v. Town Plan Zoning CommissionConnecticut Superior Court · 1956
- Strauss v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Strauss v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960