Legal Opinion

Patton v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 27, 1894PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Indictment for malicious mischief. Before Judge Hutchins. Banks superior court. September term, 1893.

1Opinion of the Court

Lumpkin, Justice. ,

As will be perceived from the head-note, we have decided this case without reference to the question whether a dog is or is not “ private property.” It may not, however, be unprofitable to notice how this question has been dealt with in other jurisdictions. In Com. v. Maclin, 3 Leigh, 809, it was, in the general court of Virginia, by a divided bench, decided that a statute making it indictable to knowingly and willfully destroy or injure any tree, or other timber, or property real or personal, belonging to another, did not authorize a criminal prosecution for the killing of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Parker v. MiseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
  2. Jemison v. Southwestern RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  3. Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
  4. United States v. GideonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1856
  5. Kinsman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. SandgrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Johnston v. WarendhCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  3. Graham v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  4. Wilcox v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  5. State v. ChurchillIdaho Supreme Court · 1909

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API