Legal Opinion

McBrien v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 12, 2009No. 08-840 CPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*342ORDER

JAMES F. MEROW, Senior Judge.

This order addresses Defendant’s Motions to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaints. The motions to dismiss assert that plaintiff has not pleaded any cause of action within the jurisdiction granted to this court.

Plaintiffs initial complaint sought damages stemming from the asserted conduct of unnamed officials in a number of federal departments, namely “Homeland Security,” “Federal Bureau of Investigation,” “Justice,” “Energy,” “Defense,” “State” and “Health.” Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint added sources of conduct, namely “President George W. Bush,” “Vice…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Keene Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Gerald Alan Brown, and Charles v. Darnell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Akinro v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  2. Modena v. NeffUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API