Legal Opinion

Akinro v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 17, 2010No. 10-10CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HORN, Judge.

The plaintiff, Francis Akinro, filed a complaint in this court on January 5, 2010, together with an application to proceed in for-ma pauperis, accompanied by a supporting declaration. Plaintiff requests to proceed in forma pauperis because he “have [sic] work very hard in the past weeks and because of different litigation he is pursing [sic] which require a lot of money to prosecute and the money peoples [sic] monitoring him take directly from his bank account which cannot be recovered.” Both plaintiffs application to proceed informa pauperis and the plaintiffs complaint…

2Cases cited84 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Resendez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  2. Davenport v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  3. Kenny D. Velasquez v. Asplundh Tree Service ExpertsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API