Legal Opinion
United States v. Moore
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 18, 2013No. Criminal No. 2008-0284PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER
JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.
Defendant Stacy Moore seeks to reduce his 120-month sentence for conviction of a crack cocaine offense based on a retroactive amendment to the sentencing guidelines. See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Because his sentence is the mandatory minimum under the governing statute, the Court will deny Moore’s motion.
In 2008, Moore was arrested and indicted for unlawful possession of crack cocaine, possession of a firearm by a felon, and a number of other offenses. He entered a Rule 11(c)(1)(C) plea agreement— an agreement that specifies an agreed-upon…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dillon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Dorsey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Pepper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- United States v. Ricardo EppsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. GrossDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- United States v. ClipperDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- United States v. BetheaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- United States v. ThurstonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- United States v. WilsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019