Legal Opinion
Lipsett v. University of Puerto Rico
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Decided March 13, 1991No. Civ. 83-1516 (JP)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
PIERAS, District Judge.
The Court has before it several post trial motions. The individual state defendants Dr. Gumersindo Blanco, Dr. José R. González Inclán, and Dr. Pedro J. Santiago Borrero have filed a Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict (judgment n.o.v.) under Rule 50(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or for a New Trial pursuant to Rule 60(b)(1) and (3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This motion also incorporates a request for New Trial under Rule 59 because defendants claim they were prejudiced by surprise testimony presented at the trial.…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Annabelle Lipsett v. Gumersindo BlancoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Hurley v. Atlantic City Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- Blakey v. Continental Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Ifill v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Curtis Park Group, LLC v. Allied World Specialty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.