Legal Opinion
Barnard v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 20, 1926No. 4723PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.
This is a writ of error to review a judgment of conviction under section 215 of the federal Penal Code (Comp. St. §-10385). The indictment charged that the plaintiffs in error had devised and intended to devise a scheme and artifice to defraud certain named persons and a large number of others, including the public generally, whose names, because of their great number and for want of information on the part of the grand jurors, were not given, and to obtain money and property by false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises. It was then charged that it…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ex Parte BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Crain v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- United States v. KenofskeySupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Wilson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Julian S. H. WEINER, Marvin Al Lichtig and Solomon Block, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Cochran v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- Stillman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Robinson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
- Butler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.